Something

by Runner Susan on September 21, 2008

in 2008 Chicago Marathon,The Dark Side,Training Runs

I kinda sorta need to do something for 3 or 4 hours tomorrow. I have a feeling that that something should be running at least 18-20 miles, but I’m thinking maybe a bike ride would do? Same benefits or no?


Related Posts:



Popularity: unranked [?]

{ 20 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Kelly September 21, 2008 at 9:59 pm

I would only ride the bike tomorrow if you plan on riding it in Chicago.

2 21stCenturyMom September 21, 2008 at 10:37 pm

I disagree. The benefits are different – and they are good. It depends on how your legs are feeling. You just did a 20K, right? So ride! Then go on a long run on Tuesday.

3 Jennifer P September 21, 2008 at 10:39 pm

Agree with Kelly, sorry pal. Biking does not make you a better running. If it did I would have qualified and won Boston 10 times, instead of bonking at my last race.

4 Doug September 21, 2008 at 10:53 pm

If only you knew someone with cycling expertise.

5 Rich September 21, 2008 at 11:11 pm

3 or 4 hours? A nap works for me.

6 Curtis September 22, 2008 at 12:02 am

There is a good reason that professional triathletes are not the best in any individual event even though they are quite excellent athletes — cross-training isn’t the same as training for your event.

Cardiovascular benefits would be about the same but as far as muscles and endurance? Not the same really. It shouldn’t hurt you to ride if you need a day off from running but it’s not going to benefit a discernible amount.

Why run 18-20 miles so soon after a 20K?

7 psimet September 22, 2008 at 1:10 am

Nice shot. New rig? Big ring small cog next time.

Real pedals, real shoes too I assume. I like where this is going.

3hrs on that saddle though will have you wishing for running shorts with razor blades in them instead though….

8 aka Alice September 22, 2008 at 2:05 am

I’m gonna go with those who say there’s a benefit…but, it’s a different benefit than running would be, so it depends on what your goal is. Also gotta agree with Psimet…three hours on a bike? I can’t even imagine…

9 Try September 22, 2008 at 4:06 am

Biking on a high cadence for over an hour, sometimes two, and trying to keep the heart rate high (above 80%), did transfer to my leg turnover when running.

It seems better to go biking rather than run 18-20 miles after a 20k, if you ask me. Bike 2 hours, then rest your legs and twitter 2 hours.

10 Rinus September 22, 2008 at 5:32 am

Go whit the bike!.
Groet Rinus.
http://rinusrunning.punt.nl/?home=1

11 Ewe the Dewd September 22, 2008 at 5:53 am

You raced 20k yesterday! An easy hour or two on the bike would be more than enough.

12 Teacherwoman September 22, 2008 at 7:52 am

If you are to get in 18-20 miles of hitting the pavement, than that is probably what you should doing. Biking for that length would be a great workout and such, but it is working different muscles.

13 Thomas September 22, 2008 at 9:06 am

Definitely no. The benefits of a long run can’t be replaced. Every heard the word specificity?

Actually, a long run on already tired legs is fantastic marathon training. Believe me, I’ve tried.

14 J September 22, 2008 at 9:09 am

Depends on what ou are trying to do. If you are not trying to train for a marathon, I’d say it’s good cross training.But if you want to run, you need to run. Ya know? Sort of like, if you want to run faster, you have to run faster in training. It is wht it is…

Biking is great cross training though. Unless you have ITB issues.

Also, running back to back or close together hard runs helps your legs feel what it’s like to run on tired legs, which is usually at the end of the marathon. When you get tired in the marathon at say, mile 18, you can’t just hop on a bike cause you’re tired.

You could walk the rest of the way.

Depends on what you are trying to achieve.
But never ever compromise your long runs.

YMMV…

15 Kevin September 22, 2008 at 11:41 am

That bike looks pretty lonely. It could use a friend. Ride it for a few hours and see how you feel. Then go get yourself a bottle of Layer Cake Primitivo. You’ll feel much better.

16 Flatman September 22, 2008 at 12:08 pm

I hope you rode…or are riding now…

If not, baby Jesus will cry.

17 psimet September 22, 2008 at 2:20 pm

aka Alice…nothing wrong with riding for 3 hours at all. Just couldn’t imagine doing it on that particualr saddle. Too big and cushy for serious riding.

I am routinely in the saddle for about 5 hrs during centuries. 9-10 hrs for the big rides I have each year. Anything under 3 hrs is not even enough time to warmup it seems like anymore.

Please don’t make baby Jesus cry…

18 fe-lady September 22, 2008 at 4:43 pm

Funny . Everyone is an ‘expert’ on this subject.
But only for themselves.
If you are sick, sick sick of running.
Ride.
And STILL get in that long run before the race.
My high cadence used in mtn. bike rides DEFINITELY carries over. For me.

P.S. Riding helps balance out muscles overworked from running.
I know. I am an “expert” on this. HA!

19 jeanne September 22, 2008 at 6:38 pm

ha ha ha ha ha

3 hours? on the bike? that you are just learning to ride? let me know how that goes!:)

of course i’m an expert! i’ve had a bike since MARCH for god’s sake.

don’t back off running just yet. you’re too close to glory in chicago!

20 BettyBetty September 22, 2008 at 6:48 pm

Fancy!

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv badge

Previous post:

Next post: